Grok Team Bots join Slack, but answer only teammates who linked their Slack account to Cursor and are on the Bot's team, each on their own Grok Bot allowance. Runbear puts named agents in Slack and Microsoft Teams channels, with tools that can act through each person's own connected accounts. Guests in Slack shared channels can use them with no Runbear account.
Runbear
Runbear is a Slack-native AI teammate. You create named agents, connect 2,000+ tools, and deploy them into the channels your team already works in. Tools set to Per-User run through the asking person's own account, and people outside your company can use those agents in a shared channel without signing up for anything.
Grok Bot
Grok Bot is xAI's agent product. Personal Bots take work from your desktop or iOS app and sign in to your tools the way you would, including ones with no clean integration. Since 28 September 2026, Team Bots (public beta) can be shared with a Cursor team and invited to Slack channels. Details here are as of October 2026, from x.ai and the Team Bots docs; it is a fast-moving beta, so confirm them with xAI.
Both products now put a shared agent in Slack. The question that sorts them is who can reach it: the members of one Cursor team, each spending their own allowance, or everyone in the channel, on Slack or Microsoft Teams.
| Feature | Runbear | Grok Bot |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Named AI agents deployed into your team's chat channels | Personal Bots, plus shared Team Bots (public beta) for Cursor teams |
| Where you talk to it | Slack, Microsoft Teams, and the web app | Desktop or iOS app; Team Bots also in Slack. No Microsoft Teams in the docs |
| Who can give it work | Anyone in the channel, including customers and vendors as guests in Slack shared channels | Members of the Bot's team who linked their Slack account to Cursor |
| Whose permissions it uses | Per-User tools act as the person who asked; Shared tools use one account | Personal Bots use your logins; Team Bot OAuth plugins use each teammate's account |
| Multi-agent work | Named agents different people mention: @Support, @Onboarding, @Billing | Bots that pass work between themselves in a thread |
| How it reaches tools | 2,000+ maintained connectors via Pipedream, MCP, native OAuth | Plugins where they exist, plus browser control for tools that lack them |
| Customer-facing work | Support, onboarding, and billing agents that answer in the thread | Guests outside the Bot's Cursor team get no answer |
| Triggers | Schedules, one-time runs, webhooks, and events in connected apps | Routines you schedule, taught by demonstrating the task |
| Audit | An audit log of configuration changes on Business and Enterprise | Approve-before-send in the product; Team Bot audit logs on Enterprise |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, plus SAML SSO on Business and Enterprise | Not stated in the Team Bots announcement or docs; confirm with xAI |
| What access costs | Usage credits, no per-seat fee, Slack guests free | An X Subscription Premium tier or higher, an eligible Cursor plan, or a linked SuperGrok or X Premium+ plan, and each person's own Bot usage |
This is the difference everything else follows from. A Grok Team Bot sits in Slack but serves the members of one Cursor team. A Runbear agent serves whoever is in the thread, in Slack or Microsoft Teams. Neither is wrong; they answer different questions.
Your agents have handles. A teammate types @Support in #customer-escalations and gets an answer where the question was asked, with the thread as context. Nobody installs anything, and nobody switches windows.
A Team Bot has its own Slack app and answers an @mention, then follows the thread. It replies only to people who linked their Slack account to Cursor and are on the Bot's team. A teammate's own chat with the Bot is private, but a channel thread is visible to the whole channel. For a team that already lives in Cursor that is a clean fit; a customer or vendor in a shared channel has no way in.
How an agent authenticates decides what it can reach when someone else asks it for something. Here the two products have converged: both can act through the asker's own account.
Set a tool to Per-User and each person connects their own account. When the agent acts in that tool, it runs as the person who asked, so it reaches only what that person's account allows. Shared tools use one account for everyone, so you grant them deliberately.
A personal Bot logs in once as you. A Team Bot, in xAI's words, "never lends one person's access to another": each teammate connects their own account for OAuth plugins, while key or token plugins use the Bot's own credential, the same for everyone.
The honest answer here is that both approaches win somewhere, and the two are complementary more than competitive.
2,000+ tools wired in through Pipedream, MCP, and native OAuth, kept current by us. When a vendor ships a breaking API change, you find out by not noticing. Anything we do not cover, you add as a custom MCP server.
Bots use your apps "including the tools that are harder to navigate": the legacy portal and the internal dashboard with no API at all. That is real reach no connector catalogue has, bought with the tradeoffs of driving a UI: it is slower than an API call, and logins, 2FA, and CAPTCHAs hand the screen back to you.
Bring a real workflow and we'll wire it live on a demo call.
Want a walkthrough first? Book 20 minutes with our CEO